Roofing's Fall-Protection Rate Problem — FY2025 OSHA Data

By Michael McCarty, President / Founder
July 16, 2026
6 min read
Federal OSHA data · FY2025

Roofers are cited for fall-protection violations at a dramatically higher rate than any other construction trade.

Federal OSHA inspected roofing contractors 3,629 times in FY2025 and wrote a fall-protection citation in 86.5 of every 100 visits, the highest rate of any trade in this dataset. Roofing alone accounts for well over half of all federal fall-protection citations nationwide. Framing sits close behind at 83.5 per 100, a risk story that gets far less attention than roofing’s. Together, roofing and framing sit in a tier of their own: nearly double siding’s rate (43.6 per 100 inspections), and roughly 3.5 to 4.5 times the rate of plumbing/HVAC, masonry, and electrical (19.3–24.2 per 100).

Federal OSHA enforcement records, FY2025 (Oct 1, 2024–Sep 30, 2025) · Standard 29 CFR 1926.501, Duty to Have Fall Protection · Data pulled July 16, 2026 · Full methodology below

86.5
Citations per 100 inspections
Roofing Contractors (NAICS 238160), highest of any trade in this dataset
83.5
Citations per 100 inspections
Framing Contractors (NAICS 238130), second highest, close behind roofing
3,686
Federal 1926.501 citations against roofers
FY2025 · out of 5,914 nationwide, well over half

The centerpiece chart

Fall-protection citation rate by trade

Measured per 100 inspections, not raw citation counts, so the comparison holds even though OSHA inspects roofing far more often in absolute terms.

Citations per 100 inspections, by trade

OSHA 1926.501 · federal only · FY2025

Roofing & framing: elevated-risk tier Other trades measured
020406080100Citations per 100 inspectionsRoofing Contractors86.5Framing Contractors83.5Siding Contractors43.6Plumbing/HVAC Contractors24.2Masonry Contractors20.4Electrical Contractors19.3*
Rate = 1926.501 citations ÷ inspections for that trade × 100, a like-for-like comparison that holds even though OSHA inspects roofing far more often in raw terms. * Electrical Contractors’ rate is based on a smaller sample (40 inspections) than the rest of this dataset; read it with more caution. Source: OSHA Frequently Cited Standards by NAICS, pulled July 16, 2026.
View the data as a table
Trade NAICS Inspections 1926.501 citations Rate per 100 inspections Avg. penalty / citation
Roofing Contractors2381603,6293,68686.5$7,320
Framing Contractors2381301,9231,96483.5$6,114
Siding Contractors23817018618843.6$3,765
Plumbing/HVAC Contractors238220515424.2$4,106
Masonry Contractors23814010411020.4$4,455
Electrical Contractors238210404119.3*$9,834

* Electrical Contractors: small sample (40 inspections). Interpret with caution.

An under-told part of the story

Framing: the second story

At 83.5 citations per 100 inspections, framing contractors are almost as exposed as roofers, and far more exposed than everyone else in this dataset, yet framing rarely gets named alongside roofing in fall-protection coverage. Roofing and framing share the same basic hazard profile: unprotected edges, open floor and roof systems, and work that by definition happens at height. Every other trade measured here sits at less than half the roofing/framing rate: siding, plumbing/HVAC, masonry, and electrical.

Not just a bigger target

The obvious objection to any “most-cited trade” claim is that OSHA simply inspects that trade more, so of course the citation count piles up. Measuring the rate per 100 inspections, instead of the raw citation count, is how this report tests that objection directly, and the rate still holds. Roofing’s 86.5-per-100 figure is nearly double the next-closest trade in this dataset (siding, at 43.6) and roughly 3.5 to 4.5 times every trade below that. Fall protection (1926.501) has been OSHA’s #1 most-cited standard nationwide for 15 consecutive years, and roofing alone accounts for well over half, roughly 60%, of the 5,914 federal 1926.501 citations issued in FY2025.

“The roofing industry led violations of the fall protection standard, followed by framers and siding contractors.” Occupational Health & Safety, Sept. 16, 2025

Independent trade-press reporting on the same FY2025 release ranks trades in the same order this report finds independently, by both citation rate and raw count: roofing, then framing, then siding. Two separate sourcing paths landing on the same result.

A secondary, honest finding

What about warehouses, universities, and other general-industry sites?

Roofing contractors work under the construction fall-protection standard, 1926.501. A lot of real-world fall-protection exposure instead falls under the general-industry standard, 1910.28: permanent rooftop access, mezzanines, and loading docks. We looked for the same rate story there, and in the interest of being straight about what the data does and doesn’t show: it isn’t there yet.

Federal OSHA’s enforcement records show only 15 inspections that checked 1910.28 compliance at warehousing and storage facilities (NAICS 493110) in FY2025, resulting in 16 citations, and just 2 such inspections at colleges and universities (NAICS 611310), resulting in 2 citations. Both are far short of the 25-inspection floor this report uses before calculating a rate. That’s the same floor that lets the chart above flag electrical contractors’ 40-inspection sample as small rather than exclude it outright.

That’s not a null result. It points to general-industry fall protection being a real, comparatively under-enforced exposure, just not one with a defensible statistic behind it yet. We’re flagging it as a direction for a future data pull, not forcing it into this report’s headline.

For journalists & fact-checkers

Methodology & caveats

+

This report leans on federal OSHA’s public enforcement data. It’s solid, but it has edges: here’s what to know before you cite it.

  1. Federal OSHA only. These figures cover federal OSHA jurisdiction only and exclude the State Plan states that run their own OSHA-approved programs: California, Washington, Oregon, Michigan, Virginia, and others. OSHA’s own published Top 10 figures are federal-only too, so the roofing-vs-national comparison here is apples to apples, but the true all-state total would be higher on both sides.
  2. Snapshot drift. Trade-by-trade figures were pulled live from OSHA’s enforcement database on July 16, 2026. The 5,914 national total is OSHA’s officially published FY2025 figure from when its Top 10 list was first released. OSHA updates its enforcement files daily as cases are finalized, so the two won’t reconcile to an exact decimal. Our six trades alone sum to slightly more than 5,914. That’s why this report says “well over half” and “roughly 60%,” not a precise percentage.
  3. No multi-year trend. The OSHA query tool used for this pull only exposes the current rolling fiscal year; we found no year-selector to rebuild a multi-year trend line. Persistence is instead evidenced by OSHA’s own disclosure that fall protection has been its #1 most-cited standard for 15 consecutive years.
  4. No establishment-count denominator. BLS’s QCEW site blocked automated access during this pull. It’s the standard source for how many roofing establishments exist, which would let us compute citations per firm. The inspection-based rate used throughout this report (citations per 100 inspections) is the primary metric and stands on its own without it.
  5. Not yet broken out. Which specific fall-protection failure (unprotected edge vs. no anchor point vs. no warning line), state-level detail, and establishment size (small vs. large contractor) aren’t in this dataset yet. OSHA’s tool supports an employee-count filter for a future pass. These are flagged as follow-ups, not blockers, for this first version.

Sources

Research & data pull: EDGE Fall Protection · Source: public federal OSHA enforcement records, pulled July 16, 2026 · Federal jurisdiction only: see methodology · Not legal or compliance advice. Back to top

by Michael McCarty, President / Founder

About the Author: Michael McCarty brings more than a decade of hands-on fall protection experience to EDGE Fall Protection, with a background that includes installing, selling, designing, and engineering fall protection systems across the country. His expertise is grounded in both technical fieldwork and safety-critical training, including Competent Person and Competent Person Trainer credentials, First Responder experience, Firefighter I certification, Hazmat Operations and Hazmat Awareness training, confined space training, CPR, rescue drills, and more than 228 hours of documented fire department training. As a holder of California and Arkansas contractor licenses for EDGE, Michael combines real-world installation knowledge, code-conscious design experience, emergency response training, and personal high-angle experience to help clients make safer, smarter fall protection decisions.

Need fall protection for your facility? Call EDGE for a free quote.